BE200NGW vs AX200NGW Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of BE200NGW by Intel and AX200NGW by Intel. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Specification Comparison
| Parameter | BE200NGW | AX200NGW |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Category | RF Modules | RF Modules |
| Lifecycle Status | Active | Active |
| Stock Status | In Stock | In Stock |
| Unit Price (USD) | $19.50 | $13.90 |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 7 (IEEE 802.11be) | IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi CERTIFIED 6) |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| Frequency Bands | 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz (tri-band) | 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz dual band |
| Max Data Rate 6 GHz | 5800 Mbps | — |
| Max Data Rate 5 GHz | 2400 Mbps | — |
| Max Data Rate 2.4 GHz | 574 Mbps | — |
| Antenna Configuration | 2x2 | 2x2 MU-MIMO |
| Host Interface (Wi-Fi) | PCIe | PCI Express |
| Host Interface (Bluetooth) | USB 2.0 | — |
| Form Factor | M.2 2230 (NGFF), Key E | M.2 2230 (NGFF, E-key) |
| Connector Keying | Key E only | — |
| Wi-Fi Alliance Certification | Wi-Fi 7 certified | — |
| FCC ID | PD9BE200NG | — |
| FCC Approval Date | 2023 (test report dated 2023-11-13 to 2023-11-24) | — |
| Marketing Family | BE6500 class / Gale Peak 2 | — |
| vPro Support | No (NGWG variant: No vPro) | — |
| Operating Temperature | [DATA_NEEDED: operating temperature range] | [DATA_NEEDED: operating temperature range] |
| Supply Voltage | [DATA_NEEDED: supply voltage] | [DATA_NEEDED: supply voltage] |
| RoHS Status | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] |
| Product Type | — | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) + Bluetooth 5.2 combo module |
| Maximum Data Rate | — | 2.4 Gbps |
| Channel Width | — | 160 MHz |
| Modulation | — | 1024QAM |
| OFDMA | — | UL and DL OFDMA supported |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Bluetooth Interface | — | USB |
| Antenna Connectors | — | 2x MHF4 (U.FL compatible) |
| Temperature Grade | — | Commercial Extended |
| Capacity Improvement | — | Up to 4x vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |
| Peak Rate Improvement | — | Nearly 40% higher vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |