XC6209B292MR vs XC6209B292MR-G Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of XC6209B292MR by Torex Semiconductor and XC6209B292MR-G by Torex Semiconductor. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Torex Semiconductor
XC6209B292MR-G - 2.9V 150mA LDO Regulator | Torex SOT-25
XC6209B292MR-G ✓ ActiveSpecification Comparison
| Parameter | XC6209B292MR | XC6209B292MR-G |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Torex Semiconductor | Torex Semiconductor |
| Category | Voltage Regulators | Voltage Regulators |
| Lifecycle Status | Active | Active |
| Stock Status | In Stock | In Stock |
| Unit Price (USD) | $0.14 | $0.23 |
| Output Type | Fixed (positive) | Fixed |
| Nominal Output Voltage | 2.9 V | — |
| Output Voltage Accuracy | plus or minus 2 % | — |
| Maximum Output Current | 150 mA | 150 mA |
| Input Voltage Range | up to 6 V | Up to 10 V |
| Dropout Voltage | [DATA_NEEDED: dropout voltage] | — |
| Quiescent Current | 25 uA typical | 25 µA (typical) |
| Standby Current (CE = Low) | less than 0.1 uA | — |
| Output Noise | [DATA_NEEDED: output noise spec] | — |
| PSRR | [DATA_NEEDED: PSRR spec] | — |
| Line Regulation | [DATA_NEEDED: line regulation] | — |
| Load Regulation | [DATA_NEEDED: load regulation] | — |
| Operating Temperature | -40 C to +85 C | -40 °C to +85 °C |
| Package | SOT-25 (5-pin) | SOT-25 (5-pin) |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Output Capacitor | Low-ESR ceramic, 1 uF minimum | Low-ESR ceramic compatible |
| CE (Enable) Pin Logic | Active-high | — |
| Protection | Current limit, thermal shutdown | — |
| RoHS Status | Compliant | Compliant |
| Manufacturer | — | Torex Semiconductor Ltd |
| Part Series | — | XC6209 |
| Regulator Type | — | Positive Fixed LDO (Low-Dropout Linear Regulator) |
| Output Voltage | — | 2.9 V |
| Protection Features | — | Current limiter with foldback, short-circuit protection |
| MSL Level | — | 1 (per industry standard) |
| Lead Free | — | Yes |