EPF10K20RC240-4 vs EPF10K20RC240-3N Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of EPF10K20RC240-4 by Intel and EPF10K20RC240-3N by Altera. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Specification Comparison
| Parameter | EPF10K20RC240-4 | EPF10K20RC240-3N |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | Altera |
| Category | FPGA & CPLD | FPGA & CPLD |
| Lifecycle Status | Obsolete | Obsolete |
| Family | FLEX 10K | Embedded Programmable Logic Device (EPLD) |
| Typical Gates | 20,000 | — |
| Logic Elements / Cells | 1,152 | — |
| Logic Array Blocks (LABs) | 144 | 144 |
| User I/Os | 189 | — |
| Package | 240-BFQFP Exposed Pad (RQFP) | — |
| Pin Count | 240 | — |
| Supply Voltage | 5 V | 5 V |
| Process Technology | 0.42 µm CMOS | — |
| Operating Temperature | 0 °C to 70 °C | 0 °C to +70 °C (commercial) |
| Speed Grade | -4 | -3 |
| Propagation Delay | 0.4 ns (per DigChip) | 0.4 ns (typical) |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | Surface Mount (gull wing) |
| MSL Level | [DATA_NEEDED: MSL Level] | — |
| RoHS Status | non_compliant (legacy BFQFP, SnPb finish) | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS compliance] |
| Embedded Memory | EAB (Embedded Array Block) SRAM/ROM | — |
| Series | — | FLEX 10K |
| Logic Cells / Elements | — | 1152 |
| Total Gates | — | 20,000 (typical usable) |
| Logic Capacity (typical) | — | 12,888 |
| User I/O Pins | — | 189 |
| Embedded Array Blocks (EABs) | — | 6 (per family architecture) |
| Number of Pins | — | 240 |
| Package Type | — | 240-RQFP (HFQFP, exposed pad) |
| Package Code | — | HFQFP / RQFP |
| Technology / Process | — | 0.42 µm CMOS |
| Maximum Internal Frequency | — | 125 MHz |
| Programming Interface | — | JTAG (IEEE 1149.1), ByteBlaster / MasterBlaster / ByteBlasterMV |
| Configuration Memory | — | SRAM (volatile, re-programmable) |
| Lead-Free | — | [DATA_NEEDED: lead-free status] |