EPC8QC100 vs EPC4QC100N Comparación
Comparación detallada lado a lado de EPC8QC100 por Altera y EPC4QC100N por Intel. Compare las especificaciones clave, los parámetros eléctricos, el encapsulado, el estado del ciclo de vida, los precios y la disponibilidad para determinar el mejor componente para los requisitos de su diseño.
Comparación de especificaciones
| Parámetro | EPC8QC100 | EPC4QC100N |
|---|---|---|
| Marca | Altera | Intel |
| Categoría | Memory ICs | Memory ICs |
| Estado del ciclo de vida | Obsolete | NRND |
| Estado del stock | In Stock | In Stock |
| Precio unitario (USD) | $17,50 | $8,10 |
| Tipo de memoria | Configuration PROM (Flash-based) | Flash (NOR, configuration PROM) |
| Tamaño de memoria | 8 Mbit | 4 Mbit (4,194,304 bits) |
| Flash Access Time | 90 ns (~10 MHz) | — |
| Configuration Bus Width | 16-bit (DQ[]) | — |
| Configuration Bandwidth | Up to 160 Mbps | — |
| Decompression Support | Yes (Altera proprietary) | — |
| Supported Configuration Modes | FPP, PS, AS (FPGA-dependent) | — |
| ISP Interface | JTAG (IEEE 1149.1) | — |
| Tensión de alimentación | 3.3 V | — |
| Temperatura de funcionamiento | 0C to +70C (Commercial) | 0 C to 70 C (commercial) |
| Encapsulado | 100-Pin PQFP (20 x 14 mm) | 100-pin PQFP (Plastic Quad Flat Pack) |
| Tipo de montaje | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Compatible FPGA Families | Stratix, APEX II, APEX 20K, Mercury, ACEX 1K, FLEX 10K | — |
| Estado RoHS | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS compliance] | — |
| Lead Free | [DATA_NEEDED: lead-free status] | — |
| Programmable Type | — | In System Programmable (ISP) |
| Configuration Interface | — | Serial / Parallel / JTAG (IEEE 1149.1) |
| Maximum DCLK Frequency | — | 66.7 MHz |
| On-Chip Decompression | — | Yes |
| Supply Voltage (VCC) | — | 3.0 V to 3.6 V |
| Typical Supply Voltage | — | 3.3 V |
| Package Dimensions | — | 20 x 14 mm |
| Pin Pitch | — | 0.65 mm |
| Packaging | — | Tray |
| Lead Free / RoHS | — | Yes (per chipdig datasheet excerpt) |
| Family | — | EPC4 Enhanced Configuration Device |
| JTAG Support | — | Yes (IEEE 1149.1 boundary-scan) |