EPF10K100EQC208-3 vs EPF10K100EQC208-1N Сравнение
Подробное сравнение бок о бок EPF10K100EQC208-3 от Altera и EPF10K100EQC208-1N от Intel. Сравните ключевые характеристики, электрические параметры, упаковку, статус жизненного цикла, цены и наличие, чтобы выбрать лучший компонент для ваших требований.
Intel
EPF10K100EQC208-1N - 100K Gate FLEX-10KE FPGA, 147 I/O, 208-PQFP | Intel
EPF10K100EQC208-1N ⚠ Последняя закупкаСравнение характеристик
| Параметр | EPF10K100EQC208-3 | EPF10K100EQC208-1N |
|---|---|---|
| Бренд | Altera | Intel |
| Категория | FPGA & CPLD | FPGA & CPLD |
| Статус жизненного цикла | Obsolete | Последняя закупка |
| Наличие | In Stock | In Stock |
| Цена за единицу (USD) | $19,80 | $54,90 |
| Family | FLEX 10KE | FLEX 10K (SRAM-based FPGA with EAB) |
| Typical Gate Count | 100,000 gates | — |
| Logic Elements / Cells | 4,992 | — |
| Embedded Memory Bits | 49,152 bits | — |
| Logic Array Blocks (LABs) | 624 | — |
| User I/Os | 147 | 147 |
| Process Technology | 0.22 µm CMOS | 0.42 um CMOS SRAM |
| Core Supply Voltage | 2.5 V (operating range 2.375 V to 2.625 V) | — |
| Propagation Delay | 0.6 ns | — |
| Internal Performance | 200 MHz | — |
| Speed Grade | -3 | -1 (faster bin) |
| Рабочая температура | 0 °C to 70 °C (Commercial) | 0 C to +70 C (Commercial) |
| Корпус | 208-BFQFP (PQFP), gull-wing | — |
| Число выводов | 208 | — |
| Тип монтажа | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Logic Family | CMOS, SRAM-based | — |
| Configuration | SRAM, volatile (requires external PROM) | — |
| Статус RoHS | unknown | Compliant (lead-free, 'N' suffix) |
| Series | — | FLEX-10KE |
| Typical Gates | — | 100,000 gates |
| Logic Elements | — | 4,992 |
| Total RAM Bits | — | 49,152 bits |
| Number of Logic Array Blocks (LABs) | — | 624 |
| Supply Voltage - Core (VCCINT) | — | 2.375 V to 2.625 V |
| Propagation Delay (max) | — | 0.6 ns |
| Корпус / Типоразмер | — | 208-BFQFP / 208-PQFP |
| Supplier Device Package | — | 208-PQFP (28 x 28 mm) |
| Configuration Method | — | SRAM, serial or parallel |
| JTAG Support | — | Yes (IEEE 1149.1 boundary-scan) |