Gemini 4 Carbon Leads MathArena but Raises AI Model Cost Questions

Gemini 4 Carbon and Fable 5.2 displaced GPT-6.1 Sol from the MathArena lead, but the source highlights higher costs and a 15-times price gap.

已發布 已更新 3 分鐘閱讀 ✓ 支援 AI 分享

TL;DR — 三句話摘要

  • Gemini 4 Carbon and Fable 5.2 moved ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol on the MathArena benchmark. (S1)
  • Gemini 4 Carbon reportedly cost 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol. (S1)
  • Benchmark scores, absolute run costs, and the complete testing configuration were not disclosed. (S1)

取自 key_takeaways （實際欄位，最多 3 筆）。事實與分析分別標示。

Gemini 4 Carbon Leads MathArena but Raises AI Model Cost QuestionsEditorial cover for a component sourcing brief. Factory motif; headline "Gemini 4 Carbon Leads MathArena but Raises AI Model Cost Questions". Reported key numbers: 15 times more. 1 cited source. Static cover (no animation).Gemini 4 Carbon Leads MathArena butRaises AI Model Cost QuestionsREPORTED KEY NUMBERS15 times more1 sourceXAIPART
Cover image generated from data already shown on this page: the category motif, the headline, and reported key numbers. No decorative illustration; no third-party image.

您來自 AI 回答 — 這是可驗證的原始內容

AI 摘要可能遺漏了其主張的依據。原始預測、受影響零件及每一項引用皆在本頁，且均可追溯至其來源。

XAIPART 預測

本簡報包含可證偽的預測。

跳至完整預測及其證偽規則 ›
受影響零件

此報導無目錄相符項目 — 寧可不顯示，也不推斷相符。

查看判定方式 ›
正在尋找零件？送出詢價 → RFQ

Reported by The Decoder on . Summarized and analyzed by XAIPART Editorial.

What happened

Google's Gemini 4 Carbon and Anthropic's Fable 5.2 moved ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol on the MathArena AI mathematics benchmark, ending the recent run of leadership by an OpenAI model.S1 The source identifies both challengers as carrying higher costs than the model they displaced.S1

Gemini 4 Carbon reportedly cost 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol.S1 During testing, Gemini ignored the imposed time limit and almost never abandoned a task.S1 The source did not disclose the benchmark scores, absolute cost per run, testing configuration, number of attempts, or whether the reported behavior affected the final ranking.S1

Key numbers
MetricReported valueSource
Gemini 4 Carbon cost relative to GPT-6.1 Sol15 times moreS1
MathArena scoresNot disclosedS1
Absolute cost per benchmark runNot disclosedS1

Background timeline

  1. - The Decoder reported that Gemini 4 Carbon and Fable 5.2 had moved ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol on MathArena, with Gemini 4 Carbon carrying a reported cost of 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol.S1

XAIPART take

Technical impact

The result suggests that benchmark leadership can reward persistence on difficult mathematical tasks rather than simply completing them within a fixed time budget.S1 XAIPART analysis Engineers evaluating reasoning models should therefore distinguish raw answer accuracy from behavior under strict completion limits, because a system that continues beyond the test window may be unsuitable for latency-constrained production workflows. XAIPART analysis

Market impact

The reported 15-times cost multiple creates a material trade-off between benchmark leadership and affordable inference, although the source does not provide enough pricing detail to calculate cost per solved task. XAIPART analysis Procurement teams should request comparable workload pricing and success-rate data before treating a higher-ranked model as the better commercial choice. XAIPART analysis

Action

Engineers should rerun representative mathematical and design calculations under both strict latency limits and unrestricted completion budgets. XAIPART analysis Buyers should obtain cost-per-successful-task figures, rate limits, and failure data for Gemini 4 Carbon, Fable 5.2, and GPT-6.1 Sol before committing workloads or negotiating supply commitments. XAIPART analysis

XAIPART Forecast

XAIPART analysis Within 9 months, XAIPART expects Gemini 4 Carbon's MathArena cost per successful task to fall below 5 times GPT-6.1 Sol's cost; if it remains at or above 15 times, this forecast is wrong. XAIPART analysis This expectation reflects the possibility that efficiency improvements or pricing changes narrow the gap, but no such adjustment was disclosed in the source. XAIPART analysis

Facts are as reported by the cited source. The design-in, sourcing and forward-looking statements above are XAIPART's analysis, not the source's claims. The report is a single-source account, and benchmark scores, absolute pricing, test settings, and the cost of Fable 5.2 were not disclosed.

Corrections: none at publication. This brief will be updated with a timestamp if the source corrects its report.

替代品與生命週期

已建檔的替代品——目錄範圍，並非市場排名
零件關係生命週期依據
— 檔案中無替代品 需要資料 — 需要 match_type 在任何前代標籤出現之前

「前代」與「替代」標籤僅來自已記錄的相符類型、生命週期狀態或來源文字。未記錄相符項目時，不顯示任何標籤。我們自家的刊登內容不構成市場參考。

值得關注

可證偽預測 — 門檻、時間窗與目前狀態。已證偽的預測仍保留可見。
主張門檻作者狀態
Within 9 months, XAIPART expects Gemini 4 Carbon's MathArena cost per successful task to fall below 5 times GPT-6.1 Sol's cost it remains at or above 15 times within 9 months Pending

事後證明錯誤的預測會保留可見並加以標記。我們不會刪除。

受影響零件

無目錄相符項目。 此消息未對應到 XAIPART 目前上架的任何零件。我們不會推測相符項目，也不會顯示佔位清單。

各維度成本壓力

Source: FRED · Generated · reference output z and composite are algorithm outputs, not a fetch snapshot

Cost pressure by dimension — composite stateDiverging bars for three dimensions around a zero midpoint. Input Cost has no reading; Supply Demand z 0.0276, neutral; Fx Energy z -0.0364, neutral. Composite index -0.1, band neutral.0Input costno readingSupply/demandz +0.0276 · neutral46 dFX & energyz −0.0364 · neutral5 dcomposite −0.1 · neutral−100 · −40 · −15 · 0 · +15 · +40 · +100
Underlying values — copyable for verification.
DimensionFRED series IDUnitLagAs of
Input costPCOPPUSDM, PALUMUSDM, PNICKUSDMUSD/mt52 d
Supply/demandPCU334413334413, IPG3344Sindex(1982=100) / index(2017=100)46 d
FX & energyDEXCHUS, DCOILBRENTEU, DHHNGSPrate / USD/bbl / USD/MMBtu5 d

No free authoritative interface for: gold · silver · rare earth · polysilicon · lithium carbonate · market share — listed rather than approximated.

本內容的產生方式

流程證據 — 擷取、來源合理性、模型與閘門
此簡報的稽核軌跡
Source fetched The Decoder · the-decoder.com · 856 chars · fetch status success
Source sanity (S1) ok — passed before any model call (no s1_ block recorded)
Model / prompt MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · prompt Blog Agent - News Summary (v2.8-final) · 6,618 tokens · 17.4s · run completed
Gate verdict pass · 6/6 applicable checks passed · spec v2.9 · C10 ratio 0.132316 · C10 rounds 0
Time contract 2 <time datetime> values in this brief — 0 violations (+08:00 or date-only)

上述每一列皆由流程產生，並非人工撰寫。

編輯評分

確定性閘門結果 — 純 PHP，判定過程無模型參與
閘門評分明細 6 項適用檢查， 6通過： 100 百分比. No hold items or mandatory failures. Gate spec: v2.9 (S0 + S1 + C1–C20) · Source affinity (C20): 0.3725. 適用檢查已通過 6 / 6 = 100% · 判定： pass No hold items or mandatory failures Gate spec: v2.9 (S0 + S1 + C1–C20) · Source affinity (C20): 0.3725 是否發布由審核關卡決定。獨立稽核分數僅供參考。

相關報導

發現錯誤？ 告訴我們哪裡有誤 ——更正會與原文一同發布並記錄。我們不會默默修改文章。

留言

成為第一個留言的人。

來源

  1. Gemini 4 Carbon takes the MathArena crown but costs 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol — https://the-decoder.com/gemini-4-carbon-takes-the-matharena-crown-but-costs-15-times-more-than-gpt-6-1-sol/ · rss · 存取於

事實標記為 S1/S2，並可追溯至連結來源。標示為 分析 是 XAIPART 自身的推理，與報導事實分開保留。來源連結會被追蹤，而非 nofollow ——署名為刻意為之。