AX210NGW vs AX200NGW Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of AX210NGW by Intel and AX200NGW by Intel. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Specification Comparison
| Parameter | AX210NGW | AX200NGW |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Category | RF Modules | RF Modules |
| Lifecycle Status | Active | Active |
| Stock Status | In Stock | In Stock |
| Unit Price (USD) | $12.25 | $13.90 |
| Product Type | Wi-Fi 6E + Bluetooth combo module | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) + Bluetooth 5.2 combo module |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac backward compatibility | IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi CERTIFIED 6) |
| Frequency Bands | 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz | 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz dual band |
| Antenna Configuration | 2x2 MIMO | 2x2 MU-MIMO |
| Maximum Channel Bandwidth | 160 MHz | — |
| Modulation | 1024-QAM with OFDMA | 1024QAM |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.3 (BR/EDR + LE) | — |
| Host Interface (Wi-Fi) | PCIe | PCI Express |
| Host Interface (Bluetooth) | USB | — |
| Form Factor | M.2 2230 (22 mm x 30 mm), Key E | M.2 2230 (NGFF, E-key) |
| vPro Support | Yes (NGW variant) | — |
| Slot Compatibility | NGFF M.2 Key A or Key E (not Mini PCIe, not CNVio) | — |
| Target Wake Time (TWT) | Supported | — |
| Operating Temperature | [DATA_NEEDED: Operating Temperature] | [DATA_NEEDED: operating temperature range] |
| Supply Voltage | [DATA_NEEDED: Supply Voltage] | [DATA_NEEDED: supply voltage] |
| RoHS Status | Compliant | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] |
| Mounting Type | M.2 edge connector, surface mount module | — |
| Manufacturer | Intel Corporation | — |
| Maximum Data Rate | — | 2.4 Gbps |
| Channel Width | — | 160 MHz |
| OFDMA | — | UL and DL OFDMA supported |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Bluetooth Interface | — | USB |
| Antenna Connectors | — | 2x MHF4 (U.FL compatible) |
| Temperature Grade | — | Commercial Extended |
| Capacity Improvement | — | Up to 4x vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |
| Peak Rate Improvement | — | Nearly 40% higher vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |