AX210NGW vs AX200NGW Сравнение
Подробное сравнение бок о бок AX210NGW от Intel и AX200NGW от Intel. Сравните ключевые характеристики, электрические параметры, упаковку, статус жизненного цикла, цены и наличие, чтобы выбрать лучший компонент для ваших требований.
Сравнение характеристик
| Параметр | AX210NGW | AX200NGW |
|---|---|---|
| Бренд | Intel | Intel |
| Категория | RF Modules | RF Modules |
| Статус жизненного цикла | Активен | Активен |
| Наличие | In Stock | In Stock |
| Цена за единицу (USD) | $12,25 | $13,90 |
| Product Type | Wi-Fi 6E + Bluetooth combo module | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) + Bluetooth 5.2 combo module |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac backward compatibility | IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi CERTIFIED 6) |
| Frequency Bands | 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz | 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz dual band |
| Antenna Configuration | 2x2 MIMO | 2x2 MU-MIMO |
| Maximum Channel Bandwidth | 160 MHz | — |
| Modulation | 1024-QAM with OFDMA | 1024QAM |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.3 (BR/EDR + LE) | — |
| Host Interface (Wi-Fi) | PCIe | PCI Express |
| Host Interface (Bluetooth) | USB | — |
| Form Factor | M.2 2230 (22 mm x 30 mm), Key E | M.2 2230 (NGFF, E-key) |
| vPro Support | Yes (NGW variant) | — |
| Slot Compatibility | NGFF M.2 Key A or Key E (not Mini PCIe, not CNVio) | — |
| Target Wake Time (TWT) | Supported | — |
| Рабочая температура | [DATA_NEEDED: Operating Temperature] | [DATA_NEEDED: operating temperature range] |
| Напряжение питания | [DATA_NEEDED: Supply Voltage] | [DATA_NEEDED: supply voltage] |
| Статус RoHS | Compliant | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] |
| Тип монтажа | M.2 edge connector, surface mount module | — |
| Manufacturer | Intel Corporation | — |
| Maximum Data Rate | — | 2.4 Gbps |
| Channel Width | — | 160 MHz |
| OFDMA | — | UL and DL OFDMA supported |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Bluetooth Interface | — | USB |
| Antenna Connectors | — | 2x MHF4 (U.FL compatible) |
| Temperature Grade | — | Commercial Extended |
| Capacity Improvement | — | Up to 4x vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |
| Peak Rate Improvement | — | Nearly 40% higher vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |