AX210NGW vs AX200NGW Pengandingan
Pengandingan Sisi Kiri Sisi Kanan Terperinci AX210NGW disebabkan oleh Intel dan AX200NGW disebabkan oleh Intel. Bandingkan spesifikasi utama, parameter elektrik, pakej, status kehidupan, harga, dan keupayaan untuk menentukan komponen terbaik untuk keperluan disenjaya anda.
Pengandingan Spesifikasi
| Parametr | AX210NGW | AX200NGW |
|---|---|---|
| Merek | Intel | Intel |
| Kategori | RF Modules | RF Modules |
| Status Lingkungan Hidup | Aktif | Aktif |
| Product Type | Wi-Fi 6E + Bluetooth combo module | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) + Bluetooth 5.2 combo module |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac backward compatibility | IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi CERTIFIED 6) |
| Frequency Bands | 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz | 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz dual band |
| Antenna Configuration | 2x2 MIMO | 2x2 MU-MIMO |
| Maximum Channel Bandwidth | 160 MHz | — |
| Modulation | 1024-QAM with OFDMA | 1024QAM |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.3 (BR/EDR + LE) | — |
| Host Interface (Wi-Fi) | PCIe | PCI Express |
| Host Interface (Bluetooth) | USB | — |
| Form Factor | M.2 2230 (22 mm x 30 mm), Key E | M.2 2230 (NGFF, E-key) |
| vPro Support | Yes (NGW variant) | — |
| Slot Compatibility | NGFF M.2 Key A or Key E (not Mini PCIe, not CNVio) | — |
| Target Wake Time (TWT) | Supported | — |
| Suhu Operasi | [DATA_NEEDED: Operating Temperature] | [DATA_NEEDED: operating temperature range] |
| Tegangan Pemberi Arus | [DATA_NEEDED: Supply Voltage] | [DATA_NEEDED: supply voltage] |
| Status RoHS | Compliant | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] |
| Jenis Pemasangan | M.2 edge connector, surface mount module | — |
| Manufacturer | Intel Corporation | — |
| Maximum Data Rate | — | 2.4 Gbps |
| Channel Width | — | 160 MHz |
| OFDMA | — | UL and DL OFDMA supported |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Bluetooth Interface | — | USB |
| Antenna Connectors | — | 2x MHF4 (U.FL compatible) |
| Temperature Grade | — | Commercial Extended |
| Capacity Improvement | — | Up to 4x vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |
| Peak Rate Improvement | — | Nearly 40% higher vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |