EPC40C100 vs EPC16QC100II Vergleich
Detaillierter Direktvergleich von EPC40C100 von Altera und EPC16QC100II von Altera. Vergleichen Sie die wichtigsten Spezifikationen, elektrischen Parameter, Gehäuse, Lebenszyklusstatus, Preise und Verfügbarkeit, um das beste Bauteil für Ihre Designanforderungen zu ermitteln.
Spezifikationsvergleich
| Parameter | EPC40C100 | EPC16QC100II |
|---|---|---|
| Marke | Altera | Altera |
| Kategorie | FPGA & CPLD | Memory ICs |
| Lebenszyklusstatus | Obsolete | NRND |
| Lagerstatus | In Stock | In Stock |
| Stückpreis (USD) | $10,50 | $10,75 |
| Memory Density | 40 Mbit | 16 Mbit |
| Device Family | Enhanced Configuration Device | — |
| Target FPGAs | Stratix, Cyclone, APEX, Mercury, ACEX families | — |
| Configuration Mode | FPP (Fast Passive Parallel) / PS (Passive Serial) | FPP / PSA (Fast Passive Parallel / Passive Serial Asynchronous) |
| Interface Voltage | 2.5 V / 3.3 V | — |
| Maximum FPP Clock Frequency | 66 MHz | — |
| Programmability | In-system programmable (JTAG) | In-System Programmable via IEEE 1149.1 (JTAG) |
| Error Detection | Built-in CRC verification | — |
| Betriebstemperaturbereich | -40 C to +85 C (industrial) | — |
| Gehäuse | 100-pin EQFP (Enhanced Quad Flat Pack) | 100-pin PQFP (Plastic Quad Flat Pack) |
| Pin Pitch | 0.5 mm | — |
| Montageart | Surface Mount | — |
| MSL-Level | 3 (168 hours) | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) |
| RoHS-Status | Compliant | Compliant |
| Lead-Free | Yes | — |
| Speichertyp | NOR Flash | FPGA Configuration PROM (Flash-based) |
| Supported FPGA Families | — | APEX II, APEX 20K, Mercury, ACEX 1K, FLEX 10K, FLEX 8000, Cyclone |
| Cascade Support | — | Yes (multi-PROM cascading supported) |
| Core Supply Voltage | — | 3.3 V |
| I/O Tolerance | — | 5 V tolerant configuration pins |
| Package Dimensions | — | 20 mm x 14 mm, 0.5 mm pitch |
| Lead Finish | — | Matte Tin (lead-free) |
| Betriebstemperatur | — | -40C to +85C (Industrial) |
| Configuration Pins | — | DCLK, DATA[0..n], nCONFIG, nSTATUS, CONF_DONE, OE |
| Compression Support | — | Yes (reduces on-PROM footprint vs uncompressed bitstream) |