EPC40C100 vs EPC16QC100II Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of EPC40C100 by Altera and EPC16QC100II by Altera. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Specification Comparison
| Parameter | EPC40C100 | EPC16QC100II |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Altera | Altera |
| Category | FPGA & CPLD | Memory ICs |
| Lifecycle Status | Obsolete | Nrnd |
| Stock Status | In Stock | In Stock |
| Unit Price (USD) | $10.50 | $10.75 |
| Memory Density | 40 Mbit | 16 Mbit |
| Device Family | Enhanced Configuration Device | β |
| Target FPGAs | Stratix, Cyclone, APEX, Mercury, ACEX families | β |
| Configuration Mode | FPP (Fast Passive Parallel) / PS (Passive Serial) | FPP / PSA (Fast Passive Parallel / Passive Serial Asynchronous) |
| Interface Voltage | 2.5 V / 3.3 V | β |
| Maximum FPP Clock Frequency | 66 MHz | β |
| Programmability | In-system programmable (JTAG) | In-System Programmable via IEEE 1149.1 (JTAG) |
| Error Detection | Built-in CRC verification | β |
| Operating Temperature Range | -40 C to +85 C (industrial) | β |
| Package | 100-pin EQFP (Enhanced Quad Flat Pack) | 100-pin PQFP (Plastic Quad Flat Pack) |
| Pin Pitch | 0.5 mm | β |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | β |
| MSL Level | 3 (168 hours) | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) |
| RoHS Status | Compliant | Compliant |
| Lead-Free | Yes | β |
| Memory Type | NOR Flash | FPGA Configuration PROM (Flash-based) |
| Supported FPGA Families | β | APEX II, APEX 20K, Mercury, ACEX 1K, FLEX 10K, FLEX 8000, Cyclone |
| Cascade Support | β | Yes (multi-PROM cascading supported) |
| Core Supply Voltage | β | 3.3 V |
| I/O Tolerance | β | 5 V tolerant configuration pins |
| Package Dimensions | β | 20 mm x 14 mm, 0.5 mm pitch |
| Lead Finish | β | Matte Tin (lead-free) |
| Operating Temperature | β | -40C to +85C (Industrial) |
| Configuration Pins | β | DCLK, DATA[0..n], nCONFIG, nSTATUS, CONF_DONE, OE |
| Compression Support | β | Yes (reduces on-PROM footprint vs uncompressed bitstream) |