IPG20N10S4L22AATMA1 vs IPD50N06S409ATMA2 Vergleich
Detaillierter Direktvergleich von IPG20N10S4L22AATMA1 von Infineon und IPD50N06S409ATMA2 von Infineon. Vergleichen Sie die wichtigsten Spezifikationen, elektrischen Parameter, Gehäuse, Lebenszyklusstatus, Preise und Verfügbarkeit, um das beste Bauteil für Ihre Designanforderungen zu ermitteln.
Spezifikationsvergleich
| Parameter | IPG20N10S4L22AATMA1 | IPD50N06S409ATMA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Marke | Infineon | Infineon |
| Kategorie | MOSFETs | MOSFETs |
| Lebenszyklusstatus | Aktiv | Aktiv |
| Lagerstatus | In Stock | In Stock |
| Stückpreis (USD) | $1,45 | $0,49 |
| FET Type | Dual N-Channel | — |
| Drain-Source Voltage (V<sub>DS</sub>) | 100 V | — |
| Continuous Drain Current (I<sub>D</sub>) | 20 A | — |
| On-State Resistance (R<sub>DS(on)</sub>) | 22 mΩ (typical) | — |
| Power Dissipation (P<sub>D</sub>) | 60 W | — |
| Gate-Source Voltage (V<sub>GS</sub>) | ±20 V | — |
| Gate Threshold (V<sub>GS(th)</sub>) | [DATA_NEEDED: Vgs(th)] | — |
| Montageart | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Gehäuse | PG-TDSON-8-10 (Wettable Flank) | PG-TO252-3-11 (DPAK) |
| Lead Configuration | Wettable Flank | — |
| Automotive Qualification | AEC-Q101 | AEC-Q101 |
| Technology | OptiMOS T2 | N-Channel MOSFET (OptiMOS) |
| Betriebstemperatur | -55°C to +175°C | — |
| RoHS-Status | Compliant | Compliant |
| Channel Count | 2 (dual independent) | — |
| Drain-Source Voltage (VDS) | — | 60 V |
| Continuous Drain Current (ID) at Tc | — | 50 A |
| On-Resistance R<sub>DS(on)</sub> max at VGS=10V | — | 9 mΩ |
| Gate-Source Voltage (VGS) max | — | [DATA_NEEDED: VGS max rating] |
| Gate Threshold Voltage (VGS(th)) | — | [DATA_NEEDED: VGS(th) typical] |
| Total Gate Charge (Qg) | — | [DATA_NEEDED: Qg typical] |
| Power Dissipation (Pd) at Tc | — | 71 W |
| Betriebs-Sperrschichttemperatur | — | -55 °C to +175 °C |
| Pin-Anzahl | — | 3 (2 + Tab) |
| Lead-Free / Halogen-Free | — | [DATA_NEEDED] |