EPC16QC100T vs EPC16QC100II 比較
詳細な並列比較: EPC16QC100T メーカー: Altera および EPC16QC100II メーカー: Altera。主要仕様、電気的特性、パッケージ、ライフサイクルステータス、価格、在庫状況を比較して、設計要件に最適な部品を判断してください。
仕様比較
| パラメータ | EPC16QC100T | EPC16QC100II |
|---|---|---|
| ブランド | Altera | Altera |
| カテゴリ | Memory ICs | Memory ICs |
| ライフサイクル状態 | NRND | NRND |
| 在庫状況 | In Stock | In Stock |
| 単価（USD） | $17.95 | $10.75 |
| メモリタイプ | In-System Programmable Configuration PROM | FPGA Configuration PROM (Flash-based) |
| メモリサイズ | 16 Mbit | — |
| インターフェース | Serial FPGA configuration + JTAG (IEEE 1149.1) | — |
| Supply Voltage (VCC) | 3.3 V | — |
| Programmability | In-System Programmable via JTAG | In-System Programmable via IEEE 1149.1 (JTAG) |
| Daisy-Chain Support | Yes (multi-device cascade) | — |
| Data Compression | Built-in decompression engine (up to 35% expansion) | — |
| FPGA Compatibility | Altera Cyclone, Stratix, ACEX, APEX series | — |
| パッケージ | PQFP-100 (20 x 14 mm) | 100-pin PQFP (Plastic Quad Flat Pack) |
| 実装タイプ | Surface Mount | — |
| 動作温度 | 0C to +70C (commercial) | -40C to +85C (Industrial) |
| Lead-Free / RoHS | Depends on date code; verify per lot | — |
| MSLレベル | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) |
| Programming Cycles | 100 typical (per Altera datasheet) | — |
| Packaging Suffix | 'T' indicates Tape and Reel | — |
| Max DCLK Frequency | [DATA_NEEDED: max DCLK frequency] | — |
| Access Time | [DATA_NEEDED: serial access time] | — |
| Memory Density | — | 16 Mbit |
| Supported FPGA Families | — | APEX II, APEX 20K, Mercury, ACEX 1K, FLEX 10K, FLEX 8000, Cyclone |
| Configuration Mode | — | FPP / PSA (Fast Passive Parallel / Passive Serial Asynchronous) |
| Cascade Support | — | Yes (multi-PROM cascading supported) |
| Core Supply Voltage | — | 3.3 V |
| I/O Tolerance | — | 5 V tolerant configuration pins |
| Package Dimensions | — | 20 mm x 14 mm, 0.5 mm pitch |
| Lead Finish | — | Matte Tin (lead-free) |
| RoHS ステータス | — | Compliant |
| Configuration Pins | — | DCLK, DATA[0..n], nCONFIG, nSTATUS, CONF_DONE, OE |
| Compression Support | — | Yes (reduces on-PROM footprint vs uncompressed bitstream) |