EPC16QC100T vs EPC16QC100II 비교
다음의 상세 나란히 비교: EPC16QC100T 제조: Altera 및 EPC16QC100II 제조: Altera. 주요 사양, 전기적 파라미터, 패키징, 수명 주기 상태, 가격 및 재고를 비교하여 설계 요구 사항에 가장 적합한 부품을 결정하십시오.
사양 비교
| 파라미터 | EPC16QC100T | EPC16QC100II |
|---|---|---|
| 브랜드 | Altera | Altera |
| 카테고리 | Memory ICs | Memory ICs |
| 수명 주기 상태 | NRND | NRND |
| 재고 상태 | In Stock | In Stock |
| 단가 (USD) | $17.95 | $10.75 |
| 메모리 유형 | In-System Programmable Configuration PROM | FPGA Configuration PROM (Flash-based) |
| 메모리 크기 | 16 Mbit | — |
| 인터페이스 | Serial FPGA configuration + JTAG (IEEE 1149.1) | — |
| Supply Voltage (VCC) | 3.3 V | — |
| Programmability | In-System Programmable via JTAG | In-System Programmable via IEEE 1149.1 (JTAG) |
| Daisy-Chain Support | Yes (multi-device cascade) | — |
| Data Compression | Built-in decompression engine (up to 35% expansion) | — |
| FPGA Compatibility | Altera Cyclone, Stratix, ACEX, APEX series | — |
| 패키지 | PQFP-100 (20 x 14 mm) | 100-pin PQFP (Plastic Quad Flat Pack) |
| 실장 유형 | Surface Mount | — |
| 동작 온도 | 0C to +70C (commercial) | -40C to +85C (Industrial) |
| Lead-Free / RoHS | Depends on date code; verify per lot | — |
| MSL 레벨 | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) |
| Programming Cycles | 100 typical (per Altera datasheet) | — |
| Packaging Suffix | 'T' indicates Tape and Reel | — |
| Max DCLK Frequency | [DATA_NEEDED: max DCLK frequency] | — |
| Access Time | [DATA_NEEDED: serial access time] | — |
| Memory Density | — | 16 Mbit |
| Supported FPGA Families | — | APEX II, APEX 20K, Mercury, ACEX 1K, FLEX 10K, FLEX 8000, Cyclone |
| Configuration Mode | — | FPP / PSA (Fast Passive Parallel / Passive Serial Asynchronous) |
| Cascade Support | — | Yes (multi-PROM cascading supported) |
| Core Supply Voltage | — | 3.3 V |
| I/O Tolerance | — | 5 V tolerant configuration pins |
| Package Dimensions | — | 20 mm x 14 mm, 0.5 mm pitch |
| Lead Finish | — | Matte Tin (lead-free) |
| RoHS 상태 | — | Compliant |
| Configuration Pins | — | DCLK, DATA[0..n], nCONFIG, nSTATUS, CONF_DONE, OE |
| Compression Support | — | Yes (reduces on-PROM footprint vs uncompressed bitstream) |