EPC16QC-100T vs EPC16QC100II 比較
詳細並排比較 EPC16QC-100T 由 Altera 與 EPC16QC100II 由 Altera. 比較關鍵規格、電氣參數、封裝、生命週期狀態、價格與供貨情況，以找出最符合您設計需求的元件。
規格比較
| 參數 | EPC16QC-100T | EPC16QC100II |
|---|---|---|
| 品牌 | Altera | Altera |
| 類別 | Memory ICs | Memory ICs |
| 生命週期狀態 | Obsolete | NRND |
| 記憶體類型 | Flash Configuration PROM (in-system programmable) | FPGA Configuration PROM (Flash-based) |
| Memory Density | 16 Mbit (2 Mbyte) | 16 Mbit |
| Supported FPGA Families | Stratix, APEX II, APEX 20K, Mercury, ACEX 1K, FLEX 10K | APEX II, APEX 20K, Mercury, ACEX 1K, FLEX 10K, FLEX 8000, Cyclone |
| Configuration Data Width | 8-bit or 16-bit (cascaded dual-device mode) | — |
| Configuration Modes | Serial (single device), Parallel (two cascaded devices) | — |
| Data Compression Support | Yes (35% to 55% bitstream reduction typical) | — |
| JTAG / Boundary Scan | IEEE 1149.1 compliant, in-system programmable | — |
| 供應電壓 | 3.3 V | — |
| 封裝 | 100-pin PQFP (20 x 14 mm), 0.65 mm pitch | 100-pin PQFP (Plastic Quad Flat Pack) |
| 工作溫度 | [DATA_NEEDED: Operating temperature range] | -40C to +85C (Industrial) |
| Cascade Interface | nCE / nOE handshake for multi-device chains | — |
| Programming Interface | JTAG (IEEE 1149.1) and serial | — |
| Endurance | [DATA_NEEDED: Program/erase cycle rating] | — |
| Data Retention | [DATA_NEEDED: Data retention specification] | — |
| RoHS 狀態 | unknown | Compliant |
| Lead-Free | unknown | — |
| MSL 等級 | [DATA_NEEDED: Moisture sensitivity level] | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) |
| 安裝類型 | Surface Mount | — |
| Configuration Mode | — | FPP / PSA (Fast Passive Parallel / Passive Serial Asynchronous) |
| Programmability | — | In-System Programmable via IEEE 1149.1 (JTAG) |
| Cascade Support | — | Yes (multi-PROM cascading supported) |
| Core Supply Voltage | — | 3.3 V |
| I/O Tolerance | — | 5 V tolerant configuration pins |
| Package Dimensions | — | 20 mm x 14 mm, 0.5 mm pitch |
| Lead Finish | — | Matte Tin (lead-free) |
| Configuration Pins | — | DCLK, DATA[0..n], nCONFIG, nSTATUS, CONF_DONE, OE |
| Compression Support | — | Yes (reduces on-PROM footprint vs uncompressed bitstream) |