ISZ072N06NM6ATMA1 vs IPTG025N15NM6ATMA1 Vergleich
Detaillierter Direktvergleich von ISZ072N06NM6ATMA1 von Infineon und IPTG025N15NM6ATMA1 von Infineon. Vergleichen Sie die wichtigsten Spezifikationen, elektrischen Parameter, Gehäuse, Lebenszyklusstatus, Preise und Verfügbarkeit, um das beste Bauteil für Ihre Designanforderungen zu ermitteln.
Spezifikationsvergleich
| Parameter | ISZ072N06NM6ATMA1 | IPTG025N15NM6ATMA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Marke | Infineon | Infineon |
| Kategorie | MOSFETs | MOSFETs |
| Lebenszyklusstatus | Aktiv | Aktiv |
| Lagerstatus | In Stock | In Stock |
| Stückpreis (USD) | $0,38 | $1,52 |
| Manufacturer | Infineon Technologies | Infineon Technologies |
| Product Family | OptiMOS 6 60V | — |
| Polarity / Channel Type | N-Channel | N-Channel |
| Drain-Source Voltage (VDS) | 60 V | 150 V |
| Continuous Drain Current (ID, Tc=25°C) | 57 A | — |
| Continuous Drain Current (ID, Ta) | 12.7 A | — |
| RDS(on) max @ VGS=10V | 7.2 mΩ | — |
| Gate Threshold Voltage (VGS(th)) | 3.3 V (typ) | — |
| Verlustleistung (TC=25°C) | 50 W | — |
| Power Dissipation (Ta) | 2.5 W | — |
| Gehäuse | PG-TSDSON-8-34 (TSDSON-8 FL) | PG-HSOG-8-1 (TOLG) |
| Montageart | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Betriebstemperaturbereich | -55C to +175C ( Tj max 175C ) | -55 C to +175 C (typical for OptiMOS 6) |
| Technology | OptiMOS 6 trench MOSFET | OptiMOS 6 150 V (N-channel trench) |
| RoHS-Status | Compliant | Compliant |
| MSL-Level | 1 | — |
| Continuous Drain Current (ID) at TA=25C | — | 26 A |
| Continuous Drain Current (ID) at TC=25C | — | 264 A (pulsed) |
| Power Dissipation (PD) at TA=25C | — | 3.8 W |
| Power Dissipation (PD) at TC=25C | — | 395 W |
| On-State Resistance RDS(on) typ | — | 2.5 mOhm at VGS=10 V |
| Gate-Source Voltage (VGS) max | — | [DATA_NEEDED: VGS max rating] |
| Gate Threshold Voltage VGS(th) typ | — | [DATA_NEEDED: VGS(th) value] |
| Total Gate Charge Qg typ | — | [DATA_NEEDED: Qg value] |
| MSL (Moisture Sensitivity Level) | — | MSL1 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) |
| Solder Joint Reliability | — | Excellent - 30% smaller footprint than D2PAK |