BE200NGW vs AX200NGW Perbandingan
Perbandingan bersamaan detil BE200NGW dari Intel dan AX200NGW dari Intel. Bandingkan spesifikasi penting, parameter listrik, pengemasan, status cycle, harga, dan ketersediaan untuk menentukan komponen terbaik untuk kebutuhan desain Anda.
Perbandingan Spesifikasi
| Parameter Umum | BE200NGW | AX200NGW |
|---|---|---|
| Merek | Intel | Intel |
| Kategori | RF Modules | RF Modules |
| Status Lingkungan Hidup | Aktif | Aktif |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 7 (IEEE 802.11be) | IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi CERTIFIED 6) |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| Frequency Bands | 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz (tri-band) | 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz dual band |
| Max Data Rate 6 GHz | 5800 Mbps | — |
| Max Data Rate 5 GHz | 2400 Mbps | — |
| Max Data Rate 2.4 GHz | 574 Mbps | — |
| Antenna Configuration | 2x2 | 2x2 MU-MIMO |
| Host Interface (Wi-Fi) | PCIe | PCI Express |
| Host Interface (Bluetooth) | USB 2.0 | — |
| Form Factor | M.2 2230 (NGFF), Key E | M.2 2230 (NGFF, E-key) |
| Connector Keying | Key E only | — |
| Wi-Fi Alliance Certification | Wi-Fi 7 certified | — |
| FCC ID | PD9BE200NG | — |
| FCC Approval Date | 2023 (test report dated 2023-11-13 to 2023-11-24) | — |
| Marketing Family | BE6500 class / Gale Peak 2 | — |
| vPro Support | No (NGWG variant: No vPro) | — |
| Suhu Kerja | [DATA_NEEDED: operating temperature range] | [DATA_NEEDED: operating temperature range] |
| Tegangan Pemuat | [DATA_NEEDED: supply voltage] | [DATA_NEEDED: supply voltage] |
| Status RoHS | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] |
| Product Type | — | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) + Bluetooth 5.2 combo module |
| Maximum Data Rate | — | 2.4 Gbps |
| Channel Width | — | 160 MHz |
| Modulation | — | 1024QAM |
| OFDMA | — | UL and DL OFDMA supported |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Bluetooth Interface | — | USB |
| Antenna Connectors | — | 2x MHF4 (U.FL compatible) |
| Temperature Grade | — | Commercial Extended |
| Capacity Improvement | — | Up to 4x vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |
| Peak Rate Improvement | — | Nearly 40% higher vs 802.11ac (per Intel) |