EPM9320LC84-10 vs EPM9320LC84-15 مقایسه
مقایسه دقیق کنار به کنار EPM9320LC84-10 توسط Intel و EPM9320LC84-15 توسط Intel. مشخصات کلیدی، پارامترهای الکتریکی، بسته‌بندی، وضعیت چرخه عمر، قیمت‌گذاری و موجودی را مقایسه کنید تا بهترین قطعه را برای نیازهای طراحی خود تعیین کنید.
مقایسه مشخصات
| پارامتر | EPM9320LC84-10 | EPM9320LC84-15 |
|---|---|---|
| برند | Intel | Intel |
| دسته‌بندی | FPGA & CPLD | FPGA & CPLD |
| وضعیت چرخه عمر | NRND | Obsolete |
| Family | MAX 9000 EPLD | MAX 9000 |
| Device | EPM9320 | — |
| Macrocells | 320 | 320 |
| Usable Gates | 6000 (typical) | 6,000 |
| Logic Array Blocks (LABs) | 16 | 20 |
| Maximum User I/O Pins | 168 (varies by package) | — |
| Pin-to-Pin Logic Delay (tPD) | 10 ns | — |
| Maximum Frequency (fCNT) | [DATA_NEEDED: fCNT in MHz] | — |
| Supply Voltage (VCC) | 5.0 V (typical, see datasheet) | 4.75 V to 5.25 V (5.0 V nominal) |
| Process Technology | 0.7 µm CMOS EEPROM/UV-EPROM | — |
| بسته‌بندی | 84-pin PLCC (JEDEC MO-047) | 84-pin PLCC (Plastic Leaded Chip Carrier) |
| نوع نصب | Surface Mount (PLCC socket also common) | Surface Mount |
| دمای کاری | 0C to +70C (commercial) [DATA_NEEDED: exact grade suffix] | -40C to +85C (commercial) [DATA_NEEDED: exact grade] |
| Programming Interface | JTAG (IEEE 1149.1) boundary-scan, Altera ByteBlaster compatible | — |
| Configuration | Non-volatile EEPROM (instant-on, no boot PROM) | — |
| وضعیت RoHS | ROHS3 Compliant (per fpgalink listing) | [DATA_NEEDED: confirm from manufacturer] |
| سطح حساسیت به رطوبت (MSL) | MSL-3, 168 hours (per fpgalink listing) | — |
| Manufacturer Lead Time | 1-7 days (per fpgalink listing) | — |
| Series | — | EPM9320 |
| Device Type | — | CPLD (Complex Programmable Logic Device) |
| Propagation Delay (tPD) | — | 15 ns (max) |
| حداکثر فرکانس کلاک | — | 117.6 MHz |
| Programmability | — | 5.0 V in-system programmable (ISP) via JTAG |
| JTAG Interface | — | IEEE Std. 1149.1 boundary-scan compliant |
| Technology | — | CMOS EEPROM-based, third-generation Multiple Array MatriX (MAX) |
| Built-in Pull-up Resistors | — | Yes, on every I/O pin |
| Architecture Feature | — | Pin-locking across design iterations |